√ #Posts!
« Be An Illegal Immigrant for a Day?Does Society Have a Say in Where You Call Home? »

Mulatto, is it socially acceptable?

Permalink 01:57:21 pm, by Chameleon Email , 464 words   English (US)


Mulatto, we all know what it means. If you're not big on multiracial issues, then I suppose I can give you the Merriam-Webster definition and etymology:

Function:
noun
Inflected Form(s):
plural mu·lat·toes or mu·lat·tos
Etymology:
Spanish mulato, from mulo mule, from Latin mulus
Date:
1593

1 : the first-generation offspring of a black person and a white person \
2 : a person of mixed white and black ancestry

As to be expected, Webster only reports the term's meaning (duh, it's a dictionary). So, I suppose we'll derive how this word may even be considered offensive to some today by starting with the etymology of mulatto.

The Spanish mulato is derived from mulo/mule. This mule, produced from a male donkey (62 chromosomes) and a female horse (64 chromosomes) has 63 chromosomes. This resulting number of chromosomes inhibits sterility in mules over 99.99% of the time (there have been a few documented cases of sterile female mules). Back during slavery times, many people operated around the paradigm that black people and white people were different species to say the least. Thus, when a mulatto was born to a black parent and white parent it was believed to be sterile like mules. It is hard for me to believe that people actually believed this phenom after the first couple of decades of its inception, because naturally mulattoes would go on to produce children with white, black, and other mulatto people. So, was it used as a constant reminder that these children spawned from two diametric forces were too different to be accepted anywhere or did bad habits just die hard?

While some people did harbor these absurdities that mulattoes were sterile, it's hard to believe that the majority of the people (whether they were racist or not) would continue believing a proven falsity. Mulatto was continually used as a description for black/white biracials until the 1930 census. By this time, mulattoes were already "successfully forced" into a Negro identity thus restoring the black-white "color" line. Now that we know the history of mulatto, is it socially acceptable to be used? It is the most accurate description of a half-white/half-black person; however, its history does carry a lot of weight.

I think that if a person wants to be empowered through the description mulatto, then that person should be respected. Just take a look at the word nigga. Many African-Americans have turned the most heinous of words into a term of endearment. Quite naturally, I don't see why mulattoes cannot do the same. Opponents would suggest just calling these individuals solely biracial. But what does biracial even mean? Exactly, it can mean a myriad of things. Again, if someone wants to be called a mulatto then more power to him/her. Or they can be solely called black. :)) :|

Daimian, Chameleon

5 comments

Comment from: Fran [Visitor]
I don't see why not. Thing is I never thought the word "nigga" was all that positive. It is a ttached to a word that is simply to negative (the N word). Mulatto isn't near the gravity of that even when you think of the mule thing. I've never heard of someone being called a mulatto and hung have you?
03/23/09 @ 14:00
Comment from: Rachel Lee [Visitor]
Concepts are offensive if people press it and the masses accept it. Why should mulatto be offensive? I don't think it has to be.

2cents from a hapa
03/24/09 @ 10:14
Comment from: Helen Rolls [Visitor]
This is nice and you make some sensical points here.

I don't think getting the word mulatto to be a popular word will be an issue. I just wonder if people will be able to see past black or white and be human. If they can do that then they can accept the way people look and identify.
03/24/09 @ 18:09
Comment from: sfrend567 [Visitor]
mulatto's deserve to be recognized! nice!
03/25/09 @ 11:40
Comment from: Friendly By Standard [Visitor]
Colour is the most obvious of all racial differences. I recommend the book Words Apart – The Language of Prejudice. Making skin color an important aspect of our lives has justified untold massacres, enslavements, crusades and pious missions. … In linguistic terms it has generated, probably to no one’s great surprise, more slurs than any other category of vilification.

It’s a pretty good bet that mulatto began this way. One can imagine it was originally accompanied by snickering, as innocent children were labelled “mules” by adults who felt superior to those they considered lowly hybrids.

Getting the word to endure will prove hard with all the etymology attached.
03/25/09 @ 13:51

This post has 8 feedbacks awaiting moderation...

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
√ go to #Top!