I am CONFIDENT that Barack Obama would have been publicly blasted had he identified himself as "White", in spite of the fact that he was raised by three "White" people. In fact, I firmly believe the same would have happened even if his physical features had people typically mistaking him for having no African ancestry.

To go one step further, I believe his political career would have suffered had he simply identified as mixed/mulatto/biracial/multicultural/etc. If he insisted that people recognize that he is Black AND White, there would have been issues. There most definitely still exists a double standard.

I used to subscribe to that age-old brainwashing that ONLY allowed a mixed person to call themselves either mixed or Black. I understood why some mixed people would call themselves Black based on their upbringing, appearance, etc. BUT, I thought it was shameful for a mixed person to pass themselves off for White. I believed the lie that this was always done out of self-loathing, hatred of Blackness, etc. Well, the more mixed people I have met of various phenotypes and upbringings, and the more I have learned about mixed folks historically, and the more I have pondered this age old double standard, the more convinced I became that a whole bunch of wool has been pulled over a whole bunch of eyes.

Some mixed/mulatto/biracial folks are Black (regardless of their appearance) and that is why they identify as such. Some mixed/mulatto/biracial folks are White (regardless of their appearance) and I think it's high time that they be afforded the same courtesy of being able to identify as what they are. Me? I am mixed in every way and have always identified as such. I don't get too much flak for that, because of how I look. Yet, it's 2009 and some mixed folks with more obvious African ancestry still get harassed for identifying as mixed. Sad

Worse yet is that society and government records tend to just consider us all Black anyway, no matter what we say. Rudeness!

Guest Author Sonia, Chameleon

I would first like to point out that anybody parading around in blackface should be censured because it is utterly demeaning and should not be "performed" by anybody at anytime. But, one must ask the question, "How does a foreign country such as Turkey come to portray President Barack as solely black?" It is no secret that our president has a white mother. So why? In a country with a relatively small black population, it is impossible for Turkey to have a similar black/white racial history as America does. In particular, the history I speak of is the convolution of mulattoes and African Americans. Since countries such as Turkey do not have the same kind of history that America has had, why would this man even consider regarding mulattoes and blacks as the same "race?" Now, I do not know what this particular video means to the masses of Turks or how it was perceived there, but here in America such behavior would result in quick ostracization. But this recent occurrence has not been the only public demonstration of blackface aimed at a prominent multiracial. Remember this:

Now, even though Spain does have a larger black population than Turkey, it still does not have the type of history America has with the one drop rule. So, again, it is unfathomable for the Spanish to consider mulattoes and blacks as the same thing.

So, the question is, "Why are these outside countries considering President Obama as solely black?" It's because that's how he has been constantly portrayed by the various news sources around America. Right after Barack Obama was elected as "the first black president," there was a survey conducted in Britain regarding the prospects of the citizens voting for a black president. 93% of Britons said they would endorse a black candidate. Britons, known for their multiracial categories on their census, even consider the president black. The American media is to blame for this discrepancy of "racial classifications." Again, I must say that blackface is wrong in every aspect; however, if you are going to insult a multiracial at least do it right.

Mulatto, we all know what it means. If you're not big on multiracial issues, then I suppose I can give you the Merriam-Webster definition and etymology:

Function:
noun
Inflected Form(s):
plural mu·lat·toes or mu·lat·tos
Etymology:
Spanish mulato, from mulo mule, from Latin mulus
Date:
1593

1 : the first-generation offspring of a black person and a white person \
2 : a person of mixed white and black ancestry

As to be expected, Webster only reports the term's meaning (duh, it's a dictionary). So, I suppose we'll derive how this word may even be considered offensive to some today by starting with the etymology of mulatto.

The Spanish mulato is derived from mulo/mule. This mule, produced from a male donkey (62 chromosomes) and a female horse (64 chromosomes) has 63 chromosomes. This resulting number of chromosomes inhibits sterility in mules over 99.99% of the time (there have been a few documented cases of sterile female mules). Back during slavery times, many people operated around the paradigm that black people and white people were different species to say the least. Thus, when a mulatto was born to a black parent and white parent it was believed to be sterile like mules. It is hard for me to believe that people actually believed this phenom after the first couple of decades of its inception, because naturally mulattoes would go on to produce children with white, black, and other mulatto people. So, was it used as a constant reminder that these children spawned from two diametric forces were too different to be accepted anywhere or did bad habits just die hard?

While some people did harbor these absurdities that mulattoes were sterile, it's hard to believe that the majority of the people (whether they were racist or not) would continue believing a proven falsity. Mulatto was continually used as a description for black/white biracials until the 1930 census. By this time, mulattoes were already "successfully forced" into a Negro identity thus restoring the black-white "color" line. Now that we know the history of mulatto, is it socially acceptable to be used? It is the most accurate description of a half-white/half-black person; however, its history does carry a lot of weight.

I think that if a person wants to be empowered through the description mulatto, then that person should be respected. Just take a look at the word nigga. Many African-Americans have turned the most heinous of words into a term of endearment. Quite naturally, I don't see why mulattoes cannot do the same. Opponents would suggest just calling these individuals solely biracial. But what does biracial even mean? Exactly, it can mean a myriad of things. Again, if someone wants to be called a mulatto then more power to him/her. Or they can be solely called black.

Daimian, Chameleon

Do you ever feel pressured to always stand up for your non-white part?

Before we answer this question, let us take a look at the life of Shelton. Shelton grew up in a majority white suburb somewhere in California. He was raised primarily by his white mother, considering his black father left her when he found out that she was preganant. From the onset of his education, Shelton was immersed into a community of only white people. One day, during his high school experience, Shelton was hanging out with a group of his friends. He was the only multiricial person present. All of a sudden, John cracks a joke about black people. Silence falls upon the crowd as everyone fixates their vision upon Shelton. Now, on the surface of this scenario you may be thinking that this was an appropriate response from Shelton's friends to look at him considering he was indeed part black. But two main questions run through my mind when I analyze this common occurence; why aren't his friends scolding the offender, and is it really Shelton's job to defend the non-white group being offended?

***As a note, feel free to juxtapose yourself with Shelton***

Let's address the first question, why aren't Shelton's friends looking at the offender instead of him? --We've all done it before; when someone makes a Jewish joke in the room, we look towards the Jew for his response while disregarding the perpetrator as if he hasn't done anything wrong.-- It's safe to assume that his friends knew that the joke was offensive, so why aren't they trying to defend him instead of waiting for his response? Furthermore, is it ultimately Shelton's job to defend black people more so than all of the other people around? Now, before we answer these questions, let us remember Shelton's communal upbringing; he is virtually a part of this group of people. Despite that he may look a little different than them, they share a common taste in music, cltohing style, phonectic speech, and everything else you can think of that would be "required" for a person to be accepted into a community. By now you're probably asking yourself, "Why is it my responsibilty to stand up against racism and not everybody elses?" Even though you are on the right pathological track, I must digress from the topic for a moment to state that "I" consider it imperative that everyone stand up against all acts of racial injustice. This article is simply here to point out that you as an individual do not deserve to be pressured into defending any group of people. So, back to my first question; why aren't Shelton's friends looking at John. The reasoning can diverge into two possibilites: his friends say these types of things when he isn't around or they care more about seeing his response and whether or not he has been offended than the severity of the joke. We can generally rule out the first scenario considering that these people are his friends that he has interacted with for the majority of his life. Therefore, we remain with just the second scenario. To address this problem, we must confront it openly. The next time this occurs, Shelton should query his friends about why they are looking at him rather than the person that said the joke.

As for the second question, "Is it really Shelton's job to defend the non-white group being offended?" Obviously his friends think it is since they ogled him after the joke was made. However, they are sadly mistaken in their belief. Next time a racist remark is made and your friends watch and wait for your response, bring to their attention that you grew up with them and are a part of their community; emphasize that the only thing that marginally separates you from them is the color of your skin. Point out that the same "differences" can be applied to blonds and brunnettes, the overweight and underweight, the tall and short, etc. So ask them, why the importance of race when you are all a homogenous commmunity.

In closing, I know that I may have posed more questions than I gave clear answers to, but it is your job to apply Shelton's situation to your life and educate your friends on the importance of community rather than race.

Daimian, Chameleon

The multicultural society, or the general multicultural/multiethnic person, is in no way shape or form associated with any known multicultural cult; Nor are we an entity whose faith lies in the terrorist agenda, with extreme beliefs and violent opposition. We are not a group formed under the belief strict devotion toward a religious belief with the means to convert others and the audacity to advocate hatred on those who are dissimilar. We’re not your IRS-money-hungry seculars who ask for donations to help spread the word of our multiethnic tongues and customs and to see our people look down upon others. We are no cult!

Apparently, I’m angry and I think because of that, I let my emotions take stride tremendously without clear thinking. So now that my steam has subsided, let me continue…

Just the other day I was speaking to my closest friend and were engaged in a pretty interesting debate on marriage and family. Having been raised very differently, it didn’t surprise me that we had opposing views on the subject. Being a female, my friend, and I a male, we tend to butt heads on certain topics that are sensitive toward each sex. So inevitably, things got a little heated.

This little conversation of ours led me to recall another engaging conversation we had months back and reminded me on how angry I felt after we had spoken. This same friend and I talked about the whole hapa/multicultural movement and about the people I made friends with over on a hapa community website, but again, it all left me feeling very heated afterward because of the nature of my sensitivity on the topic itself. My friend isn’t a make-up of more than one blood; she is a Japanese-American, born and raised in NYC but was raised by Japanese parents with strong Japanese customs. Yet, although she is aware that there is a strong tide in the multicultural society nowadays, she still happens to be somewhat cautious. Cautious in a way that I don’t think I’ll quite fully understand; however, it brought me to this angered state and left me wondering if there is actually something about our population that we, or I, should be careful for.

“Careful with what?” I asked, feeling like my newfound pride in my hapa-ness/multicultural-ness has been undermined.

“Careful. With. What?” I ask again after a moment of dead air over the phone.

“I dunno… just be careful, is all I’m saying. You don’t know who these people are. You don’t know what they want,” she said.

This created even more confusion because now she’s suggesting that the people whom I call my ‘internet friends’ (some of whom I’ve actually met here in the city) or the site itself, could be attached to some anti-society or an underground social subgroup with antipathetic and hostile intentions on the rest of society.

My friend never quite gave me the a clear explanation which only fueled my anger towards what she was telling me. It made me feel that from a non-multiethnic individual or group, can have this audacious point of view towards the multicultural and label us as something the world should be wary of; to suggest that perhaps this site is a proponent toward causing harm to others. Was there no sense of joy or happiness in her, in that I have found something new that I’m proud after years of emotional turmoil? Why must I be careful? Why must it be a priority to look out for these people whom I have a connection with that my own friend and I don’t have? Why must that be undermined by the thought of having to be careful? Was it all just simply coming out of her unwilling to trust so easily? Or was it that she saw some sort of unspoken danger in the people like us?

Whatever she was trying to say, it didn’t make it out clear and only enraged me to a certain extent and to believe that others who are non-multiethnic perceive us as some sort of potential fanatical group or cult. We are people who are trying to give a voice in this already loud world; trying to promote our existence to others who can’t fathom it and even trying to understand more ourselves. We are like a movement similar to those that came before us. If that is what you fear, my friend, then this is who you fear.

Takeru, Chameleon

PS. I feel that I may have strayed a little too personally with this; so if anything needs clarifying, just ask and I'll do my best to figure it out for you. In fact, i'm still wrestling with all this.